ninetydegrees (90d)☕ (
ninetydegrees) wrote in
dw_dev_training2010-02-23 01:18 pm
QFaN: how thorough are redirects supposed to be?
The case: bug #2398 is about moving editpics to editicons. If I have a look at the patch submitted for a similar bug (bug #2396) it seems simple enough (and something a baby like me managed to actually patch \o/).
The question: should the 'renaming' be more thorough for this bug? In other words, should all references to editpics in other files such as allpics.bml and /site/index.bml be changed and should related files such as editpics.css and editpics.js be 'renamed' too? Or should we trust the redirect to make everything work smoothly and not bother?
The question: should the 'renaming' be more thorough for this bug? In other words, should all references to editpics in other files such as allpics.bml and /site/index.bml be changed and should related files such as editpics.css and editpics.js be 'renamed' too? Or should we trust the redirect to make everything work smoothly and not bother?

no subject
Hmmmmmmmm. Yes you can fix those as well, just make sure that they're also fixed in whatever processes the form (likely something that looks for $POST{editpics$suffix} somewhere down the page)
no subject
no subject
($LJHOME/cvs contains dw-free, dw-nonfree, and a bunch of other folders, including bml)
no subject
no subject
Hmm. I don't see anything like this, no.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*salutes*