Simon (
swaldman) wrote in
dw_dev_training2012-07-08 09:51 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
Confusing fonts!
Just a warning to people after my last half hour of "why doesn't this work":
If you use the Microsoft font "Consolas" for your terminals, you may find that the characters "l" and "1" look almost identical.........
I had a look at some of the other monospaced fonts I have on this system. They all fall into either "those characters look the same" or "much less readable". Consolas is a good font, except for that confusion!
So, I post this to,
If you use the Microsoft font "Consolas" for your terminals, you may find that the characters "l" and "1" look almost identical.........
I had a look at some of the other monospaced fonts I have on this system. They all fall into either "those characters look the same" or "much less readable". Consolas is a good font, except for that confusion!
So, I post this to,
- Vent my frustration
- Warn others
- Ask if anybody has a favourite terminal font, and what it is?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
None of them suffer from the 0/O 1/l problems.
This page lists these and a few more.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
here's another decent font for these purposes. Although I'm still using Ubuntu Mono as this one is a bit wide for me.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/